IRS Commissioner Dodges Income Tax Question – No Law!
Monday, November 30th, 2009 at
6:59 am
New York Times reporter David Cay Johnston asked IRS Commissioner Mark Everson, “What law requires Americans to file or pay income taxes?” His answer: Blah blah blah blah blah; dodge dodge dodge dodge online medicine without prescription dodge. The IRS Assistant Commissioner’s answer: Blah blah blah blah blah; dodge dodge…
Oh so now the truth comes out! You make your living off the of whole income tax scam. No wonder you are all for it! You are a leech, nothing more. You earn your living promoting a fraud and take money from people to help them pay a tax they don’t owe in the first place. A dubble whammy! What a hero!
Oh here we go, you have a law degree and a Master’s in Tax. I guess we should all get on your knees and bow down to the all mighty tax master! You think you have a few extra letters after your name then that makes you an expert? No way. I am an expert in income taxes because I study the Internal Revenue Code, not because I paid for a degree to give me a MS or a JD after my name.
Very good observation. Its a typical IRS response. The IRS claims its mission is to help Americans understand their tax obligations. But whenever we ask them where is the law that requires us to pay federal income taxes, they either refuse to answer the question, reply that the question is frivolous, or threaten that our argument (its a question, not an argument) can lead to penalties or imprisonment. And people are so stupid to believe we live in a free country.
this is what is missing in Title 26: “There shall be assessed, levied, collected, and paid annually upon the gains, profits, and income received in the preceding calendar year by every citizen of the United States . . . from any profession, trade, employment, or vocation carried on in the United States or elsewhere, or from any other source whatsoever, a tax”
Title 26 has to say that either all excises are subject to taxes or specify which ones. Title 26 has specifications and since the income is not the subject of the tax, millions of Americans are paying in to a system that does not tell them what it is that they are taxing. Can this nation be so stupid?
“The income tax is, therefore, not a tax on income as such. It is an excise tax with respect to certain activities and privileges which is measured by reference to the income which they produce. The income is not the subject of the tax: it is the basis for determining the amount of tax.”
House Congressional Record, March 27, 1943, page 2580.
You really want to talk about paying your fair share? Each time congress, with the help of the Federal Reserve Bank, injects extra money into circulation the resulting inflation causes your wages to buy less and less and less. But your wages are always trailing inflation.
When it comes to revolt we are not just talking about law, we are talking about a system. We need to get rid of the Federal Reserve, the income tax and we need to shield our property from the wall street specialist. They could song and dance all they want in wall street but the party need not be at the expense of working people…
Very well put.Watch out when “The System” all goes world wide
the “Laws”will be changed for stronger control and the united states will no longer have a constitution.The People only have resistance to fall back on.Time to start all over again for freedom.
People, what everyone needs to do is learn EXACTLY what the code says, and this is very important, HOW it says it. The code IS constitutional, yet taxing your private sector, unprivileged receipts is not. So, how can this be? You have told, and have allowed others to tell, the Gov. your pay IS taxable so they tax you. How the hell did I do that you say? Find out the way I did. Google CRACKING THE CODE by Peter Hendrickson. Go to his website and start reading. Wake-up from the Matrix people.
There is going to come a time when the supreme court is going to contradict itself and everyone is going to know about it. Once the supreme court contradicts itself and it becomes popularly known then we will no longer rule by law.
It may be best not to get tangled in the double speak and deception of codes and laws.Unless you have been skilled to do so over many years,with daily experience.The “income”tax $y$tem is corrupt to its core.Stop funding it
What a dumb bitch! The lady says the courts have asserted the IRS right to levy taxes. Thats bullcrap. The IRS has no authority nor does it levy taxes! Congress is the one who can levy taxes. And the only taxes that Congress can lay are the taxes in Article 1, section 8 of the Constitution which are duties, imposts, and excise taxes. The IRS does not levy taxes, its job is to adminster the tax code. The lady can’t say where the law is requiring us to pay income taxes because there is no law.
That’s right, freenow77! Also, the IRS is NOT part of the U.S. government; it’s part of the British monarchy, as the proof lies in IRS Publication 6209—the free documentary, Esoteric Agenda, exposes all of this, as well as the Bush-Windsor / Merovingian bloodline (Bush is cousins with Obama, Al Gore, and John Kerry)!
“The Income tax system is based on voluntary compliance” – this phrasing
is found in numerous IRS documents
including IRS training manuals for
its own agents. Whoops, looks like we
are finally having to tell the “Emperor”
that he’s wearing no clothes. Davey is
not even initiated into the problems
facing the Tax Code so he has to have
Dale help him out – how sad is that?
Either the system is voluntary or it is
not. If they wanted or needed to use
the word “mandatory”,they would have!
If you examined [the 16th amendment] carefully, you would find that a sufficient number of states never ratified that amendment. -U.S. District Court Judge, James C. Fox, 2003
The 16th Amendment was created in 1913 when they changed the Constitution and handed over the printing press to The private Federal Reserve Bank! Its owned by the Rothschild / Rockefeller crime syndicate that pulled off 911to launch there illegal wars so Rockefeller Standard Oil could lay the pipe lines in Afghanistan
Yet nonetheless, I’m sure no court’s going to say that the 16th amendment permitting income is void for any reason, although I wouldn’t mind filing for a rebate myself
-Judge Fox
So the 16th amendment ratification question this was just a recollection by the judge that he read ’somewhere’. It was hardly a careful examination by the judge and definitely not a ruling.
I bet you’ve never even looked at Pub. 6209, have you?
the IRS is a validly created governmental agency and not a “private corporation.” It enjoys the sovereign immunity of the United States, and thus is entitled to summary judgment in this cause of action.
YOUNG v. IRS
@RetSquid
*sigh*
IRS Publication 6209 is a decoding manual for the type of taxes being paid; if you actually look at the blocking series in which U.S. taxpayers full under, you will find that taxes paid using Form 1040 are in payment to the United Kingdom. You should read it yourself before saying I haven’t, dumb sh1t.
And I bet that you’ve never looked at UNITED STATES CODE Title 28 3002 (15) (A) (B) (C), where it states that the UNITED STATES is a “corporation;”—YOU GOT OWNED!
8.The Eight Circuit Court of Appeals has stated The general term income is not defined in the Internal Revenue Code. U.S. v. Ballard, 535 F.2nd 400, 404 (8th circuit, 1976)
What is your income? Send a letter to the IRS and ask them to show you any law that requires you to pay a tax on your Labor. I’ve done it and they won’t respond. The people that get sent to prison by a jury NEVER SEE ANY LAW that they have violated. Read some cases, watch FREEDOM TO FASCISM
Also, do a Title search for
Personal Income.Its not there that i could find it either.FEDERAL INCOME.
all i heard from them was “bullshit bullshit bullshit”
That’s right!
NOTE: If you see your comment removed, it’s absolutely not me; it’s “you-know-who!” (Hint: G00G13)
SECOND NOTE: The view count will continue to decrease. I’ve seen it as high as 34,800+
I wonder why this is…