Which one do you think would be in danger the most the Judge, Prosecutor, Jury or a Defense Lawyer?
Tuesday, November 10th, 2009 at
10:29 am
If someone was to retaliate, who do you think would be in the most danger the judge, prosecutor, jury or the defense lawyer? There have Buy Acomplia been cases where people come up murdered because of the outcome of a trial.
I work for the U.S. Attorney’s office and we have had several prosecutors killed.
So I say it’s the prosecutor who has the most to lose.
Judge, because he or she makes the final decision. Criminals never want to accept blame for themselves, so it is always someone doing it to them.
judge
prosecutor , just look at the duke rape case , the prosecutor made a case out of nothing
I think perhaps the judge as he is the one who serves out the penalty……
The prosecutor they set the charge
The Jury… They are the ones who help the Judge choose which sentence… The judge can be replaced by someone who would have harsher punishments…
Jury.
I think the prosecutor would be the most likely. Since he is the one making accusations that are sometimes not true, this can make anyone agitated, enough to kill someone.
I agree the prosecutor but i think they would all be in danger
ALL of the above
JUDGE. Look at the numbers of murders, or attempt on judges. Including stalking and assualt.
depends on which one the criminal blames the most. Judge due to sentence recieved, DA for bringing charges, and/or defense attorney for not winning the case.
It actually depends on the specifics of the situation but any of those can be in direct danger. Sometimes members of the jury are targeted during the preceedings.
Depends on the outcome of trial. All are at stake. Judge for sentencing defendant. Prosecutor for successful prosecution of defendant. Defense lawyer for unsuccessful defense of defendant. I would have to say the jury is at least risk due to their number, kinda impossible to single them out. All if accused is not detained at end of hearing/finding, for example if out on bail. Something would lead me to believe that if the defense lawyer wasn’t appointed but hired, he/she might be at most risk. Defendant might take it more personal.
I would have to say the judge, because most criminals don’t know how the legal system works so they blame it all on the judges.
What a question, for the sake of IF, I guess it would greatly depend on what one or all of them did to drive you to the extreme
personally, I think someone would have to be NUTS!!!. Is that what the problem is ????
The judge and the lawyers would be in the most danger. I have seen people telling the absolute truth and a lawyer can make them look like a liar by getting them so confused so they don’t even know what they just said. A sharp lawyer can manipulate things so bad, maybe I should say good, they can make a pope look like a liar. I can see a loved one or family member getting so upset they go looking for revenge. Also there are some judges that are on the take or have no common sense and should be run out of town.
THE PROSECUTOR
OJ hated marsha clark and she seemed to hate him right back.
i think the judge and prosecutor are definately the ones at risk, i really don’t think the defense lawyer is in much danger but the jury might be…….altought if they went after the jury they would 100% surely be caught 12 random people with one thing in common is a dead give away…. and why get caught again because your pissed off you where caught the first time?????
The defense attorney. The perp and their family know them best and know how to reach them the easiest. Also, perps and defense attorneys often disagree about the handling of the case, sometime in a very volatile way.